"For Services Rendered": A Story and Its History

If you’ve visited my other blog lately (it’s called My Machberet, and it focuses on matters of more specifically Jewish cultural and literary interest), you’ve likely noticed my multi-part interview with Kelly Hartog, the founding editor of Scribblers on the Roof, an exciting new online forum for Jewish fiction and poetry.

Scribblers on the Roof does not currently pay its contributors, but it does accept reprints, and it’s there that you can now read my short story, “For Services Rendered,” which, in various incarnations, has also appeared in Solander: The Magazine of the Historical Novel Society and J Journal: New Writing on Justice. It’s a story that means a lot to me, and I am grateful to Kelly for publishing as well my guest post explaining why.

Friday Find: Creating Van Gogh

Creating Van Gogh is a new blog from John Vanderslice, chronicling Vanderslice’s progress as he writes an historical novel featuring Vincent Van Gogh. I think it will particularly interest those of us who give a lot of thought to the use of “real” people in historical fiction. (Side note: The addition of Creating Van Gogh to the links at left signals the first [to my knowledge] set of husband-and-wife featured links here at Practicing Writing: Creating Van Gogh is married to Wordamour!)

Enjoy, and have a great weekend!

The Thursday Web Browser

I know–Wednesday is the day for the Web Browser–but there is so much to share that I’m taking the liberty of making the regular “column” a two-day event this week:

While nixing cookie service at faculty meetings (or perhaps because of this cost-cutting measure), Harvard manages to purchase the archive of John Updike.
==========
Intriguing article about the day job/writing dilemma(s). (via Galleycat)
==========
The first-ever Compleat Biographer conference has been scheduled for May 2010 in Boston, and “biographers who are willing to put on a workshop, chair a panel discussion, or make a presentation” are in demand. (NB: According to The Biographer’s Craft, the conference date will be May 15, rather than the May 23 I just saw on the conference Web site.)
==========
And in case you’ve been offline for the last day and a half: this year’s Man Booker award has gone to Hilary Mantel for Wolf Hall.

Craft Tips Culled from Contest-Judging

If you’re a Practicing Writer newsletter subscriber, you’ve already seen this piece, which was featured in the issue that went out last week. But I thought I’d reprint it here. Enjoy!

CRAFT TIPS CULLED FROM CONTEST-JUDGING

by Erika Dreifus

As some of you may remember, my writing practice recently expanded when I was invited to judge a short fiction competition. I am very grateful to have been asked to take on this role, and I am eager to see the winning stories announced (which should happen at the beginning of October).

One of the most interesting aspects of reading the nearly two dozen finalist pieces that were forwarded to me was the opportunity to reflect, once again, on what makes a story “succeed.” Since I was required to comment on each winning story – touching on why I’d selected it as well as offering some ideas on what might further improve it – I had ample reason to revisit some of the lessons I have absorbed over the years about the craft of fiction. And so, this month, I thought I’d share five tips on how to strengthen a story based on my recent immersion in an array of short fiction contest entries.

1. Give your story a title. A title can help pique a reader’s attention and ease her transition into the story. (And from this judge’s admittedly idiosyncratic viewpoint, it simply seems more appropriate to award a prize to a specific story rather than to “Untitled.”)

2. Unless you have a specific purpose – such as writing a story *entirely* in direct dialogue – it’s a good idea to vary the direct and indirect approaches. Incorporating direct dialogue provides an opportunity to render characters more distinct through their individual word choice, dialect, and cadence. Indirect dialogue can be especially useful for summarizing information that need not be presented word for word.

3. Again, unless you’re seeking to attain a specific effect, vary sentence structure and sentence length. Same goes for paragraphs. Shake things up! Everything – words, sentences, paragraphs – is a tool in your writerly toolbox. Use it all to maximum effect!

4. In the case of the competition I judged, writers had the option to begin the story with a prompt that presented a first-person narrator-character looking into a mirror. Ordinarily, however, having a character look into a mirror and describe his or her eyes, hair, teeth, etc., is not a very useful technique. Unless, perhaps, you wish to heighten the sense of your character’s narcissism (or self-criticism).

5. It’s a rare successful story that is composed of a character’s unsituated memories/ruminations.

And one last tip, although I know we all hear it all the time: proofread, proofread, and proofread again. You do not want a judge stopped mid-read by misplaced apostrophe marks.

Now, go forth, write, and submit!

Friday Find: The New Yorker’s Remnick at the CUNY J-School

Listen to this conversation with David Remnick, editor of The New Yorker. Remnick’s host is Steve Shepard, dean of the CUNY Graduate School of Journalism. (I’m especially fond of the comments Remnick makes early in the discussion about learning about writing and literature from practicing writers!) Enjoy, and have a great weekend!

David Remnick, editor of The New Yorker from CUNY Grad School of Journalism on Vimeo.