The Practicing Writer’s Quandary: Discussing Your Work in Progress

Thanks to my day job, which validates time spent scanning The Chronicle of Higher Education‘s Web site, I’ve become a fan of the posts at the group “Brainstorm” blog. And I’m a particular fan of Gina Barreca, a professor of English and feminist theory at the University of Connecticut. In addition to simply being very engaging and well-written, Barreca’s posts often touch on aspects of writing and/or teaching writing.

Here are the opening paragraphs of a recent post titled “Should You Discuss Your Work in Progress?”:

I recently learned a lesson about a serious need to shut up. I’m 52 years old and my whole life people who have my best interests at heart have told me not to have a big mouth when it comes to announcing my ambitions, wishes, projects, or loves.

I wish I had listened sooner, better, or at all. I wish, particularly, that I had NOT said anything to anybody about the fact that I am editing a collection titled Make Mine a Double: A Celebration of Women and Drink.

Especially if you keep reading that post, you, like me, might start to think about the wisdom of making your own projects known.

For me, the issue materialized not long after I read Barreca’s post. On my next visit to Brian Klems’s Questions and Quandaries blog, I found a post addressing the legality of writing sequels to famous books. Which caught my attention because about three years ago I began musing about a sequel of my own, to a very famous book, indeed.

That project hasn’t gone anywhere (admittedly, my efforts have been far too feeble). But here’s the point: As soon as I considered blogging about the Questions and Quandaries post, which I thought presented a worthwhile topic for Practicing Writing, I couldn’t help thinking about the one from Barreca.

And I wondered just how much to share about my own possible sequel while blogging about the Klems post. Even if I might receive some excellent advice that could jumpstart the project, I just don’t think I can – or should – go public with it.

I’m not talking about sharing the idea with just two or three trusted writer friends. Or even sharing a manuscript excerpt – should one ever be ready! – in a workshop or writing group, although that certainly does require a leap of faith. But I’ll admit that I haven’t always been comfortable mentioning my sequel idea to potential agents (even agents with sterling reputations) who wanted to know what they might eventually expect beyond my story collection. So you can imagine how I might agonize about sharing it more widely.

Like on a blog.

So, fellow practicing writers, what do you think? Does any of this resonate? And at what point in a project do you feel “ready” to tell a wide circle of others what you are working on?

From My Bookshelf: Vacation Reads

Well, I managed to read all four books I had with me on vacation. I won’t mention one of them, because I really did not enjoy it, and I think it has already received more publicity than it merits, but the other three are well worth your attention:

Both Ways Is the Only Way I Want It is Maile Meloy’s latest story collection. Sad, creepy, and oh-so-smoothly-crafted. The story “The Girlfriend” is still haunting me.

Fearless Confessions: A Writer’s Guide to Memoir. Stay tuned for an interview here on the blog with this book’s super-smart author, Sue William Silverman.

–Unnamed novel. I think it’s generally bad form to publicize the titles of books you have under review before the actual review appears. So you’ll have to wait a little while to hear about this one. But you WILL hear about it (my editor is expecting the review on Saturday, which is going to be a bit of a challenge, but I’m up for it!). Sorry for the delay.

What have you all been reading lately?

Follow-up on The Atlantic’s Latest Fiction Issue

Just wanted to follow-up on my earlier mention of The Atlantic‘s latest fiction issue and point you to some of the work I most enjoyed and am still thinking about. You can access each piece here.

–“The Laugh,” a story by Téa Obreht (see also the interview with Obreht)
–“Furlough,” a story by Alexi Zentner (see also the interview with Zentner)
–“Eyes on the Prize,” an essay by Alice Sebold adapted from The Best American Short Stories 2009.

Have you had a chance to read the issue yet? What impressed you? Please share, in comments (but do recall that I will be on the Internet only intermittently this week and therefore it may take some time for your moderated comment to appear).

The Wednesday Web Browser: On Writers Past, Present, and Future

This week’s New Yorker includes a fascinating article on the famed Little House series and its authorship. The article appears to be available only to subscribers or in print, but if you’re free at 3 p.m. (ET) today, writer Judith Thurman will be answering questions in a live chat. As of yesterday, the site was accepting questions for Thurman ahead of time.
==========
We might be forgiven for being a little envious of this guy.
==========
You’ve probably heard about consultants who help students apply to college (which can be a controversial topic, as the response to a recent NYT article recently proved). Now, there’s Abramson Leslie Consulting, offering “services for applicants to graduate creative writing programs,” provided by recent graduates of the Iowa Writers’ Workshop (services are currently limited to applicants in fiction and poetry).

Friday Find: The Atlantic’s Summer Fiction Issue (2009)

I am off in a few hours for a long-anticipated weekend with three of my closest friends from college. We’re all celebrating big birthdays in 2009, and it’s an off-reunion year for our college class, so we’re holding our own mini-reunion and converging in the Midwest. I can’t wait!

Before I board the plane this afternoon, I’m hoping to pick up a print copy of The Atlantic‘s latest fiction issue at the airport. The contents are online, too, so you don’t necessarily need to find a newsstand.

Enjoy, and have a great weekend!